← Studies Suggest 🧠 Psychology

Rage Rooms Charge $50 to Smash Things. A Meta-Analysis of 154 Studies Found Venting Anger Makes It Worse.

A 2024 meta-analysis of 154 studies involving 10,189 participants found that activities designed to "let anger out" — punching bags, screaming, smashing plates — have an effect size of essentially zero. Activities that lower physiological arousal, like deep breathing and meditation, reduced anger and aggression with a Hedges' g of −0.63.

By Daniel Koresh, Behavioral Science · May 25, 2026

Listen to this article
Loading...
Shattered ceramic pieces scattered on a concrete floor in soft diffused light

📋 The Study

Title
A meta-analytic review of anger management activities that increase or decrease arousal: What fuels or douses rage?
Authors
Kjærvik S. L. & Bushman B. J., 2024
Institution
The Ohio State University; Virginia Commonwealth University
Journal
Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102414
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102414
Sample
154 studies, 184 independent samples, n=10,189 total participants
Method
Meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-experimental studies comparing arousal-increasing vs. arousal-decreasing anger interventions
Key Finding
Arousal-decreasing activities significantly reduced anger and aggression; arousal-increasing activities had no effect
Effect Size
Hedges' g = −0.63 [95% CI: −0.82, −0.43] for arousal-decreasing activities; g = −0.02 [−0.13, 0.09] for arousal-increasing activities
Counterintuition
⚡⚡⚡⚡ 4/5
Replication
Meta-analyzed. Synthesizes 154 studies across multiple decades, populations, settings, and delivery methods. Consistent with Bushman's (2002) experimental findings and prior CBT-focused meta-analyses.

The Theory Everyone Believes

You already know the advice: hit a pillow, scream into a void, take it out on a punching bag until the feeling passes. The idea that releasing pent-up anger is therapeutic traces back to Aristotle's concept of catharsis and was cemented into popular culture by Freud's hydraulic model of emotion, which compared the psyche to a steam boiler that must periodically vent pressure or risk catastrophic explosion.

This belief is not marginal, and rage rooms now operate in most major U.S. cities, charging customers $30 to $100 per session to smash televisions, glassware, and old printers with baseball bats while wearing safety goggles. Therapists recommend venting exercises, parents tell children to punch pillows, coaches tell athletes to channel aggression, and an entire self-help industry rests on a single hydraulic assumption: that anger is a finite resource, and expressing it depletes the supply.

Wrong — it has been wrong for decades, and the evidence just became definitive.

What 154 Studies Actually Found

Sophie Kjærvik and Brad Bushman at Ohio State University published the largest quantitative review of anger management strategies ever conducted. Their 2024 meta-analysis in Clinical Psychology Review aggregated 154 studies encompassing 184 independent samples and 10,189 participants, a pool spanning college students, incarcerated populations, individuals with intellectual disabilities, clinical patients, and community samples drawn from multiple countries.

They sorted every intervention by physiological direction: arousal-increasing activities like hitting punching bags, jogging, cycling, and swimming, versus arousal-decreasing activities like deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, mindfulness meditation, slow-flow yoga, diaphragmatic breathing, and structured timeouts.

The gap between the two categories was enormous. Arousal-decreasing activities produced a Hedges' g of −0.63, a medium-to-large effect robust across every subgroup the authors tested, with a confidence interval of −0.82 to −0.43 that comfortably excluded zero. These interventions worked in labs and in the field, when delivered digitally and in person, in group and individual sessions, across criminal offenders and people with no criminal history, across students and community adults from diverse racial and cultural backgrounds.

Arousal-increasing activities told the opposite story: a Hedges' g of −0.02, statistically indistinguishable from doing absolutely nothing at all. Jogging was the single activity most likely to make anger worse. Not better. Worse.

Why the Steam Boiler Is Wrong

The meta-analysis was theoretically grounded in Schachter and Singer's two-factor model of emotion, a framework that is deceptively simple. Any emotional experience consists of physiological arousal plus a cognitive label: your heart pounds and you interpret the situation as threatening, and the combination of body and interpretation becomes anger, and this is why cognitive behavioral therapy attacks the label, with prior meta-analyses establishing its efficacy at a pooled effect size of roughly 0.76. What Kjærvik and Bushman tested was the other side: does reducing the body's activation state independently reduce anger, even without changing how you think about the provocation that caused it?

It does. Powerfully. And the reason venting fails becomes obvious through this lens: punching a bag does not drain anger like steam escaping a pipe, but instead elevates heart rate, floods the bloodstream with catecholamines, and sustains precisely the physiological state the brain is already interpreting as rage. You are rehearsing anger, not releasing it.

Bushman demonstrated this experimentally in a 2002 study in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. He provoked 600 undergraduates with insulting essay feedback, then assigned them to hit a punching bag while thinking about the insulter (venting), hit a bag while thinking about fitness (distraction), or sit quietly. When given the chance to blast the insulter with painful noise, the venting group was the most aggressive while the quiet group was the least, a result showing that doing nothing beat actively trying to let the anger out (DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289002).

The Strongest Case for Catharsis

The most credible defense comes from subjective experience: people consistently report feeling better after smashing things, and that experience is genuine. The mechanism, though, is not what catharsis theory predicts. A 2024 study by Isobe and colleagues in Scientific Reports found that discarding anger-written notes reduced self-reported anger, yet the pathway was cognitive, not hydraulic: participants symbolically threw the emotion away through a ritual of meaning rather than sustaining arousal through violent exertion.

Physical exercise has well-documented benefits for long-term mood via endorphin release, serotonin upregulation, and BDNF-mediated neuroplasticity, and that part is real. But the Kjærvik and Bushman analysis draws a critical distinction that matters enormously for practice: exercise improves baseline mood without reducing acute anger, and those are profoundly different things for anyone trying to manage a specific rage. Feeling calmer after a long run is not the same as defusing the specific fury directed at the colleague who took credit for your work thirty minutes ago.

What We Didn't Prove

The distinction matters for extrapolation, because the meta-analysis focused on acute anger reduction in experimental and controlled clinical settings; it did not track outcomes over months or years of sustained practice. Chronic anger patterns in clinical populations with intermittent explosive disorder or PTSD may respond differently than laboratory provocation paradigms, and extrapolation from short-term studies to lifelong management strategies requires caution.

The analysis could not disentangle expectation effects from genuine physiological mechanisms either, and this gap is real: participants who believe breathing will help may benefit partly through that belief, and the same process may explain why rage room customers leave satisfied despite no measurable change in aggression.

The "arousal-increasing" category also grouped diverse activities under a single heading, and binary classification may mask important nuances: jogging alone increased anger, while team sports showed an unexpectedly calming pattern, likely because structured play introduces positive social context that offsets raw physiological activation.

The Bottom Line

Catharsis theory has no empirical foundation. None. Across 154 studies, the evidence is unambiguous: venting anger produces a null effect of g = −0.02, while breathing, meditation, and progressive muscle relaxation produce a g of −0.63, comparable to cognitive behavioral therapy.

The rage room industry sells a product built on a debunked theory, and every session reinforces the neural association between anger and physical aggression, making real-world escalation more likely rather than less.

What You Can Do

When anger strikes, slow your body down first. Box breathing (inhale 4 seconds, hold 4, exhale 4, hold 4) directly targets the sympathetic arousal sustaining the emotion. A free app or five-minute guided video accomplishes what a $75 rage room session cannot.

Replace the pillow-punching advice with progressive muscle relaxation: systematically tense each muscle group for five seconds, then release, repeating from toes to forehead, because the deliberate contrast trains the autonomic nervous system to downshift on command.

Exercise for fitness, not for fury. Running, cycling, and swimming are excellent for cardiovascular health and long-term mood regulation, but they are poor tools for managing acute anger. If you are furious and want to go for a run, wait twenty minutes first, because the gap allows the initial spike to subside, transforming the run from an anger amplifier into a mood stabilizer.

Sources

  1. Kjærvik, S. L., & Bushman, B. J. (2024). A meta-analytic review of anger management activities that increase or decrease arousal: What fuels or douses rage? Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102414. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102414
  2. Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 724–731. DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289002
  3. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. DOI: 10.1037/h0046234
  4. Del Vecchio, T., & O'Leary, K. D. (2004). Effectiveness of anger treatments for specific anger problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(1), 15–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.006
  5. Isobe, Y., et al. (2024). Anger is eliminated with the disposal of a paper written because of provocation. Scientific Reports, 14, 5765. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55604-0